Welcome Home

As I posted in my last discussion on Rough Rider vs CASE, I'm having issues with the thinness of some of the Rough Rider blades.

I questioned this on the Rough Rider Facebook page and was confronted by someone there that said that all the RR blades, in the traditional patterns, were 1/16".  They even tried to say that the blades in a similar CASE knife we're also 1/16".  I haven't heard anything back from them after I posted a side by side of a Rough Rider 603 and a 75 pattern CASE.

Tobias Gibson said I should check the RR298, as the blade specs appeared to indicate thicker blades.

Well, my RR298 came in today and in a quick inspection showed the blades to indeed be thicker than the 603.

While not as robust as the CASE,  it certainly appears that the, older, 298 has thicker blades than the, newer, 603.

Is this a trend that Rough Rider is following in order to keep costs down?

Anyone else notice a significant change in blades lately?

Views: 93

Replies to This Discussion

I've always been pleased to carry a Rough Rider knife.  The 298 is a discontinued pattern that I would not hesitate to carry on a daily basis.

Perhaps I'm just getting more picked, in my old age, but I, personally, would be embarrassed to carry one of the new ones.  I'm sorry, Rough Rider, but if this is the direction that you're taking, I'm off the boat.

It was kind of humorous to see the  RR guy trying to compare the Rough Rider to a CASE, when that same comparison is what prompted my initial post.

https://m.facebook.com/comment/replies/?ctoken=2070838306279181_207...

I'd really like to have one of the carbon Stockmans, but they really need to beef back up the blades.

I certainly don't mind paying extra, for decent blades.

 Have to agree, seems the newer R.R. blades are thinner.

It's really a shame, too.

I was very lucky to find my RR323 while comparing blades.

Vaughn Devereaux said:

 Have to agree, seems the newer R.R. blades are thinner.

RSS

White River Knives

Latest Activity

Kenneth W. Hill replied to Jan Carter's discussion Production numbers, do they matter? in the group Great Eastern Cutlery hosted by Ken Mundhenk
4 hours ago
John Bamford commented on John Bamford's photo
4 hours ago
Kenneth W. Hill replied to Jan Carter's discussion Production numbers, do they matter? in the group Great Eastern Cutlery hosted by Ken Mundhenk
4 hours ago
J.J. Smith III commented on Sergi C. Heideman's status
5 hours ago
J.J. Smith III commented on Sergi C. Heideman's status
5 hours ago
J.J. Smith III commented on John Bamford's photo
5 hours ago
David Mullins commented on David Mullins's photo
6 hours ago
John Bamford commented on John Bamford's photo
7 hours ago

Featured
dead_left_knife_guy commented on J.J. Smith III's status
17 hours ago

Featured
dead_left_knife_guy commented on John Bamford's photo
17 hours ago

KnifeMaker
Sergi C. Heideman left a comment for Bruce Voyles
20 hours ago
Steve Scheuerman (Manx) commented on John Bamford's photo
20 hours ago

KnifeMaker
Sergi C. Heideman posted a status
"OH! And to J.J. Smith. I may have you beat, but not by much: 19,710 + 20 days for leap years!"
21 hours ago

KnifeMaker
Sergi C. Heideman posted a status
"In celebration of turning the BIG 80 I have lowered prices of my high end knife stands by about that much. Take a look. StalayUSA.com"
21 hours ago
Edward Ard posted photos
23 hours ago
J.J. Smith III commented on John Bamford's photo
yesterday

Reed Cutlery Company

Visit Lee' s Cutlery

gear2survive !

KNIFE AUCTIONS

Boy's Knife is HERE

KNIFE MAGAZINE!!!

JSR Sports!

Click to visit

© 2019   Created by Jan Carter.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service