Featured

Lockback vs. Linerlock

I have several of both.  I like the lockbacks better myself.  They just seem to be a sturdier more secure lock than the linerlocks.  Is either one generally regarded to be a better more secure locking mechanism?

Load Previous Replies
  • up

    Paul Work

    I strongly prefer a lock back.  I have had a modern liner lock come open in my pocket and have had frame locks partially open when dropped.  Neither experience instilled a lot of faith. 

  • up

    Tobias Gibson

    Yeah I think i know what you mean, if you're talking about  those spring assisted tactical  liner-locks.  If they don't come with a safety-latch forget about it.  

    But if you're talking about liner-lock knives such as   a Case Russlock or the Rough Rider locking Sodbuster then there is no worries about accidental blade deployment.  These knives still have a slippy back spring which keeps the blade closed.  The liner lock only keeps the blade open.

    Every knife is different. That said, I still fall on the lock back side of the survey.

  • up

    Paul Work

    Liner locks like the Russlock are a different animal all together.  They are a basic slip joint with the addition of a line lock.

    Modern liner locks are only held closed by side pressure for the lock and a detent.  There's not a whole lot holding them closed.

    Ain't no way I'd carry a spring assisted knife unsheathed.  I'm not that trusting.