Welcome Home...THANK YOU FOR BEING A PART OF OUR COMMUNITY

The Buck 110 lockback folding hunter is a classic knife, & an icon.  Personally, while I own at least two of these knives (the classic design, & a "custom shop" design), I'm not the biggest fan of the basic design (too heavy, too square, two-hand opening).  One of the features I despise most about this knife is the blade steel on the classic model -- 420HC.  Back when 420 steels crashed onto the knife scene, it was a cost-cutting measure -- 420 was cheaper to purchase than 440C, and because it was softer it was easier & thus cheaper to work than the 440C they'd used before that. 

Sure, Buck formulated a heat-treat process to better harden their steels, but this is far from uniform (I've had three budget Buck knives -- 2 folders & a fixed blade -- that wouldn't hold an edge well at all).  The Buck heat treat might be phenomenally successful in their pricier knives, but given my experience with budget Buck knives, I'm really not inclined to put my more expensive Bucks to the test, especially since one of them is very sentimental.

But what really gets to me about Buck's switch to 420 blade steel is the insult to their customers.  There are few names in cutlery more recognizable than Buck's, & there are few knife companies that had more options for knife manufacturing than Buck -- but still, 420 steel is what they chose.  Most likely for production at scale -- but this was, to be clear, a cost-cutting measure over all else.  

Buck rolled the dice & placed their bet, & overall I'd say they've been winning -- they still have a significant market share & wide-spread name recognition.  But they've been jacking up the price of that knife with 420 blade steel & all the aesthetics of a brick over the years.  I think I bought my basic 110 when the market price was in the $45 - $54 range.  Apparently the retail price went up to $65 at some point -- but we're even past that point.  Now, the retail price of the Buck 110 is $89.99, aka $90.

$90.

Just let that sink in.  I understand that there are a lot of fans of the Buck 110 -- some of whom may even be reading this post, & I very much apologize for upsetting anyone whom I would consider a friend over my opinions on the 110.  But I can't stay silent any longer.  I can't hold back my feelings on how Buck has been shorting customers for decades over the 110 since they transitioned to 420 steels for this knife.  Not now, now that this knife has gone up to $90.

To repeat:  $90.  

That's almost $100.  How many options are there for knives in this price range?  Maybe not many, if you're only shopping the big box stores.  But anyone who's willing to drop $100 on a knife (don't forget sales taxes, after all) knows how to shop online, & they'll soon find myriad options at that price point when they do.

$90.

Apparently, Buck hasn't changed the prices for any of its more expensive custom-shop Buck 110's.  As one YouTuber put it, Buck hasn't raised the ceiling, but instead only raised the floor.  I understand having affection for certain knives -- & with all the peculiarities of the 110, including its place in knife history.  And all the kids whose family members may have carried 110's, I very much understand the sentimental nature of the 110 for so many people who grew up around them.  But again, my issue isn't with the users or collectors, but with the company itself.

And again, accounting for sales tax, this is now a $100 knife.  This is horrifying, & it's absurd.  We're not far at all from the model number and the price tag being perfectly in line.

Views: 13

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Wow. I'm doing what you asked...I'm letting this sink in....and all I got is Wow. I'm not sure what exactly lit you up, because you don't write like this on a whim. This has been brewing for a while.

I like it - thank you for saying what many of us have been thinking. I think it's a really good opinion piece. I too own several 110's...but not because I could afford them - not new anyway. Never could. I searched and seached for the best seasoned knife I could find (ya - I mean used). I did save my coin, however, for a new 50 year commemortive back in 2014...not sorry either. But I differ from you in that I am a huge fan of the classic design. I can't explain why - I just am. I love all of them - the Schrades, Camillus, Coast Cutlery, Montana, Ka Bar, Frost, Parker, and all those who made the bazillion releases for Sears Craftsman. All these "Clones" of the Buck 110 - the 5-inch folding hunter.

They're heavy, they take two hands to open... and close, and they're versitle; they can be dressed up, beaten up, and polished up. They work well in the shop, on the line, in camp, and in the kitchen. They work well with BBQ, poultry, and game. They can be specialized or EDC. They're old school - and that appeals to me.

For me, they are the perfect folding fixed blade knife out there. But I am referring of course to the breed - not the brand. At the heart of your argument, it's about a specific model from a specific brand, and the steel used. You make some well founded points, and I agree with you. After growing my own collection of these knives I can say with some authority that if you're going to spend $100 on a Buck 110, seek out a classic two, three, or even four dot (1969-1985) varient. The two dots are all 440C, three and four dots are 425M steel. From 1986 on is the 420HC you speak of. 

Good stuff brother - it's a good read.

Never could afford a Buck 110, in my earlier years.  Still not willing to drop $100.00 on one now.

I did pick up a 110 Lt, at the Walmart,  when they had them on sale for $19.99.

That's a far step from a hundred bucks.  Personally, at my age, the Lt is just about perfect,  with a nice weight and the size of the grand daddy 110.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

whiteriverknives.com

© 2026   Created by Jan Carter.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service