Welcome Home...THANK YOU FOR BEING A PART OF OUR COMMUNITY

I picked up this PAL RH50 knife at at an estate sale and tried to research it on Google and could find nothing resembling it, at least with this handle. I did find a Remington example with a similar handle with a Remington UMC logo inside the circle. Mine did not have the logo and on close examination I realized it had been buffed off with only the designation Trade Mark at the bottom of the circle. I am guessing that PAL was using left over parts from Remington and this knife would have been part of their early production. The sheath has the Boy Scout mark but there is no evidence of one on the blade.

Views: 443

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The book "New England Cutlery" by Phillip R. Pankiewicz has an interesting short history  of PAL. It has line drawings of an RH 34 with a similar shape but a stacked leather handle rather than what is shown.  It may have been made in Holyoke, Ma or Bridgeport, Ct.  The company seemed to manufacture from 1939 to the early 1950s when the factory closed because machinery wore out.   PAL started out in Plattsgurgh, NY.   

I gave up looking for a PAL RH50 with the UMC handle and instead explored Remington UMC knives looking for examples with the hard rubber UMC handle. I found several, most of which were RH28's that had that handle and one exammple of a RH29. The most significant difference between the PALs and the Remingtons was the ponnel attachment. The dRemingtons' tangs went through the pommel and were attached with a split nut which could be tightened. My PAL and others are attached with a brass pin going through the pommel into the tang which does not protrude through the pommel. Some PALs may use the Remington technique with the split nut. One drawback with the pin attachment is lack of adjustment without dismantling the handle. My knifehas a loose handle and pommel. I don't intend to tighten it. A Remington RH29 example is attached.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

whiteriverknives.com

Latest Activity


KnifeMaker
Doug Ritter posted a discussion
8 hours ago
Lars posted a blog post
yesterday
David L. Packham commented on Nick Hansen's group Buck 110 Group
Monday
David L. Packham commented on Nick Hansen's group Buck 110 Group
Monday
David L. Packham replied to Doug Ritter's discussion Shocking 9th Cir. Decision Against CA 2A Switchblade Ban Appeal…NOT!
Monday
George R Naugle commented on Paul S's blog post C. F. Wolfertz Allentown Pa and Wilbert Cutlery Co Lockback Hunters
Sunday
Lars replied to Dennis Hibar's discussion A new iKC calendar and a new year of knives!
Sunday

Featured
dead_left_knife_guy replied to Doug Ritter's discussion Shocking 9th Cir. Decision Against CA 2A Switchblade Ban Appeal…NOT!
Sunday
Dennis Hibar replied to Dennis Hibar's discussion A new iKC calendar and a new year of knives!
Sunday
J.J. Smith III commented on Lars's blog post The 5-inch Folding Hunter – In a Class All Its Own
Saturday
Jack commented on Lars's blog post The 5-inch Folding Hunter – In a Class All Its Own
Saturday

KnifeMaker
Doug Ritter posted discussions
Saturday
Lars commented on Lars's blog post The 5-inch Folding Hunter – In a Class All Its Own
Saturday
George R Naugle commented on George R Naugle's blog post My first hunting knife
Friday
Jack commented on Lars's blog post The 5-inch Folding Hunter – In a Class All Its Own
Friday
Jack commented on George R Naugle's blog post My first hunting knife
Friday

© 2026   Created by Jan Carter.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service